Oscar
Pistorius’ natural response to the intruder he believed had broken into
his home the night he killed girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp would be to fire
his gun, rather than flee, according to an expert.
Speaking
for the defence on day 37 of the Paralympian’s murder trial in
Pretoria, Wayne Derman, a professor of sport and exercise at the
University of Cape Town, said that for Oscar Pistorius ‘to flee is not
an option because the individual does not have lower legs’.
Derman added that Pistorius is a 'paradox' whose racing triumphs contrast sharply with the severe limitations of his disability.
He said the contrast likely contributed to stress and anxiety for Pistorius.
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEOS
'Fight, not flee': Oscar Pistorius has
no option to escape in the face of danger because of his disability, an
expert at the Paralympian's murder trial said
Distracted: Pistorius uses a phone as he sits in the dock
Professor
Derman, who has treated Pistorius, told the trial on Thursday that
thinking stops when 'flight or fight' kicks in, and that his patient is
always more likely to fight, because of his ‘significant disability’.
Pistorius
maintains that when he fired his gun through the bathroom door of his
home on February 14, 2013, killing Steenkamp, he thought he was shooting
an intruder.
He previously told the trial: ‘I was not thinking - I just fired.’
Professor
Derman told the court he found Pistorius to be 'hyper-vigilant' and was
restless, often looking around quickly and scanning for possible
threats.
'He is an anxious individual,' Derman said.
He also noted that Pistorius has a hand tremor as well as a sleep disorder that required medication.
The defense wants to show that the athlete had a deep sense of vulnerability and it was a factor in the 'mistaken shooting'.
Chief
prosecutor Gerrie Nel during cross-examination argued that Derman's
testimony is likely to be biased because as a physician he is obligated
to 'act in the best interests of his patients'.
Derman countered that he has backed up all his points with scientific facts.
'The truth would come before my patient,' Derman said.
Nel said: 'You cannot give evidence against your patient, sir.'
He
suggested on Thursday that Pistorius acted methodically on the night he
killed Steenkamp because he had to locate his gun, which was not where
he normally kept it, then take the weapon out of its holster and then
move down a passage from the bedroom to the bathroom while scanning for
the perceived threat.
'The accused was careful before he entered the passage,' Nel said.
The
trial heard earlier that Oscar Pistorius does not display the
narcissism associated with men in abusive relationships and linked to
'rage-type' murders, according to a psychologist's report.
The report adds to conflicting evidence about the character of the double-amputee runner.
Preparation: Oscar Pistorius has his
tie adjusted by his uncle Arnold Pistorius, right, in court during his
ongoing murder trial in Pretoria on Thursday
Kenny Oldwage, one of the defence
lawyers of South African paralympian Oscar Pistorius, gestures as he
speaks during his client's murder trial at the High Court in Pretoria
The
defense has sought to support Pistorius' contention that he killed the
29-year-old model by mistake, fearing an intruder was about to attack
him; the prosecution says the Paralympian is a jealous egotist who shot
Steenkamp after a Valentine's Day argument.
Dr.
Jonathan Scholtz, a clinical psychologist, found no evidence that
Pistorius had a history of 'abnormal aggression or explosive violence'
but concluded he has a record of feeling insecure and vulnerable,
particularly when he is without his prosthetic limbs, defense lawyer
Barry Roux said. He read excerpts from the psychological report, part of
a court-ordered evaluation of Pistorius' state of mind over 30 days at a
state psychiatric hospital.
The
evaluation, which included a separate report by three psychiatrists,
said Pistorius was not mentally ill when he killed Steenkamp.
That
conclusion appeared to remove the possibility that Pistorius could be
declared not guilty by reason of mental illness. On Wednesday, his
defense team tried to show that the psychologist's report supports the
Paralympian's account of a mistaken shooting because his disability and
purported fear of crime contributed to a heightened sense of
vulnerability.
Trial: A supporter hugs Oscar Pistorius on Wednesday at the court in Pretoria
When
physically threatened, Pistorius might have a fearful reaction that
could 'seem extraordinary when viewed from the perspective of an
able-bodied person, but normal in the context of a disabled person with
his history,' said Roux, quoting from the report. The lawyer also cited
the psychologist as saying Pistorius has become severely traumatized
since the killing and will become an increasing suicide risk unless he
continues to get mental health care.
At
times during his trial, Pistorius has wailed and retched in apparent
distress, particularly during graphic testimony about the shooting and
also when the athlete was on the witness stand. At other times, he has
been calm and taken notes. Nel has suggested Pistorius feigned distress
in order to dodge a tough cross-examination; the athlete's camp has
denied his emotional displays were fake.
Nel
has portrayed Pistorius as a reckless narcissist with a penchant for
gunplay and driving at high speeds. He has highlighted arguments between
the runner and Steenkamp in the weeks before he killed her, though the
defense has said most of their communication was normal and
affectionate.
Pistorius,
who is free on bail, faces 25 years to life in prison if found guilty
of premeditated murder, but he could also be sentenced to a shorter
prison term if convicted of murder without premeditation or negligent
killing. Additionally, he faces separate gun-related charges.
No comments:
Post a Comment