Monday 28 July 2014

Menace of the new parking cowboys: Drivers 'fined' £100 for overstaying by minutes at fast food chains and shops

‘Cowboy’ parking squads hired by High Street firms are hitting hundreds of thousands of drivers with £100 ‘fines’ and using threats to make them pay up.
The companies – employed by fast food chains, retailers and railway operators – issue what appear to be official penalty notices, similar to those used by council traffic wardens. They then extract huge sums from drivers who are sometimes just a few minutes late in returning to their cars.
However, the tickets do not have the same legal standing as official fines. Many are being issued unfairly and – in some cases – without proper legal authority.
Warning: A branch of McDonald¿s Drive-Thru with parking restrictions advertised at the entrance
Warning: A branch of McDonald’s Drive-Thru with parking restrictions advertised at the entrance
The ‘bounty hunter’ tactics are an unintended consequence of the outlawing of clamping on private land in 2012. Private firms who used to fleece motorists with
clamps have simply switched tactics and now issue £100 tickets to those judged to have overstayed.
But consumer groups say High Street names such as McDonald’s are letting their reputations be dragged through the mud due to their association with suspect firms hired to police their car parks.
Have you been the victim of private parking cowboys? Contact the Daily Mail via parking@dailymail.co.uk
Some offer a limited free parking period while others charge. But the parking firms often issue tickets safe in the knowledge that many drivers will simply pay up even though they often have an excellent chance of winning an appeal.
If tickets are ignored, firms often follow them up with threatening letters – sometimes purporting to be from baliffs. But the notices are not backed by criminal law and cannot be enforced without a County Court order.
The Daily Mail can reveal that McDonald’s has a contract with MET Parking Services – which has links to an ‘unfit’ debt collection agency and a firm of solicitors which was shut down because of staff dishonesty.
MET is contracted to make sure vehicles do not stay beyond a permitted time at 104 of the fast food giant’s car parks.
But there have been claims that its wardens are placing £100 penalty notices on cars even when families are simply eating inside the restaurant.
MET also polices 21 car parks belonging to Chiltern Railways, which runs services through Buckinghamshire to the West Midlands.
Fast food chains, including McDonalds, shops and railway operators employ companies like MET Parking Services, who issue what appear to be official penalty notices, similar to those used by council traffic wardens
Fast food chains, including McDonalds, shops and railway operators employ companies like MET Parking Services, who issue what appear to be official penalty notices, similar to those used by council traffic wardens
Last night Marc Gander, of the Consumer Action Group, said: ‘Private parking companies are part of a bounty hunting fad which has risen up over the past few years and is making an industry of penalising people without good reason or for their simple human mistakes.
‘Big brands like McDonald’s don’t seem to appreciate how this new industry operates or the sense of anger and injustice that it produces in its victims and who are also their own customers.’
Often motorists know that they are in the right but when they get a letter that looks like an official fixed penalty notice, followed by a letter that looks like an official bailiff’s letter, they pay up because they are scared
Edmund King, AA president 
AA president Edmund King said that ‘cowboy tactics, scaremongering and bullying’ were being used by many private parking companies.
‘Often motorists know that they are in the right but when they get a letter that looks like an official fixed penalty notice, followed by a letter that looks like an official bailiff’s letter, they pay up because they are scared.’
He said that the British Parking Association is paid for by the car parking industry, a situation akin to ‘inmates guarding the jail’.
Retired Scotland Yard superintendent Bernie Gravett said: ‘MET Parking do not have staff on site. Rather they operate mobile patrols to rotate around a group of car parks. Their operative will walk into the car park and issue a Parking Charge Notice or PCN.
‘The PCN has all the appearance of a lawful Penalty Charge Notice issued by the authorities.’
In 2012, MET Parking was one of six firms that had their access to the DVLA database of number plates, names and addresses suspended for a period for issuing misleading information to motorists.
If people refuse to pay the penalty fee, the company passes the case on to a debt recovery firm such as Roxburghe Debt Collection, of West Byfleet in Surrey.

CHASED FOR UN-OWED MONEY

Wheel clamping on private land was made illegal two years ago following campaigns by the Daily Mail and motoring groups.
As a result, most companies switched to using parking penalty notices. But many are wrongly applied, leading to thousands of drivers being chased for money they do not owe.
The notices are not backed by criminal law and can be enforced only in the civil courts.
A driver in a private car park is deemed to have accepted the rules and terms, providing these are spelt out clearly on substantial signs that can easily be seen.
If they stay longer than allowed, they are deemed to have agreed to meet the appropriate sanction which can be a £100 penalty, cut to £50 for swift payment.
A driver hit with an unfair penalty cannot be compelled to pay unless the company first gets an order from the County Court. The firms rarely do this as it is too expensive. Instead, they rely on threats of legal action.
Earlier this year, Roxburghe was declared ‘unfit’ to hold a credit licence by the Office of Fair Trading. Its tactics include arranging for a solicitor’s letter to be sent to the driver, generally adding more than £200 in charges.
Some of these were issued under the name of GPB Solicitors in Stratford-upon-Avon. Last October, the Solicitors Regulatory Authority looked into the firm’s practices and closed it down. It found there was ‘reason to suspect dishonesty’ on the part of an employee.
Roxburghe is appealing against the OFT’s decision that it is ‘unfit’. Incredibly, its managing director is Gary Osner, who sits on the board of the British Parking Association, which, in theory, is responsible for policing parking companies.
McDonald’s said: ‘All parking contractors that we work with are approved by the British Parking Association and are required to meet strict standards which address appropriate levels of charges and behaviours demanded from staff.’
MET Parking insisted its staff issue penalty notices only when they have good evidence that a driver has stayed beyond the permitted time.
Chief executive David Marks said: ‘When we receive an appeal in respect of a charge notice that has been issued, we consider all the evidence provided, any mitigating circumstances and the decision process agreed in respect of each individual site with our clients.
‘Should the motorist’s appeal be unsuccessful we offer them the opportunity to appeal to POPLA, the independent appeals service.’
Roxburghe did not respond to requests for a comment. However, it issued a statement earlier this year saying: ‘We have consistently provided the highest levels of service to our clients and their customers.’

£100 FINE FOR DIABETIC WHO STAYED PARKED 16 MINUTES TOO LONG

 
An 80-year-old diabetic was targeted by McDonald’s private parking wardens after suffering a medical emergency while parked at its outlet at Gatwick airport.
Charlie Webley, right with his daughter Sharon, needed to wait at the restaurant longer than planned to ensure his blood sugar had stabilised before he could to drive on safely.
Two days later a parking penalty notice arrived from MET Parking. 
It had captured the details of the car using automatic number plate recognition cameras and the official DVLA database. 
After the firm was told about his condition it doubled the charge from £50 to £100 because it was not paid within 14 days.
Mr Webley, from Strood in Kent, had travelled to the airport last summer to pick up his daughter Sharon, who owns the car. 
Miss Webley, 54, said: ‘Effectively, we were sent a £100 penalty for over-staying by just 16 minutes.’
The civil servant launched a successful appeal to the independent tribunal service POPLA and the penalty was cancelled.

DM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...